The grey list is a FATF statement, not a country list you invent

A blog cannot freeze the answer. Checked against FATF's increased-monitoring statement of 19 June 2026 and FATF's black and grey lists page on 14 October 2026. This is general information, not legal advice. This page does not reproduce those statements. A low-transparency place is tax havens and money laundering. A different cross-border risk is proliferation financing. Formation services are AML for trust and company service providers. The sector map is /tranche-2.

Two statements, two jobs

FATF's increased-monitoring statement is what people call the grey list. FATF describes it as strategic deficiencies the jurisdiction has committed to fix on a timetable, under increased monitoring. A separate statement covers high-risk jurisdictions subject to a call for action. They are not one document. AUSTRAC ties a mandatory enhanced due diligence step to a jurisdiction where FATF has called for enhanced due diligence, and to particular people present in or formed in it. Increased monitoring is not that call. Do not treat every grey-list headline as enhanced due diligence, and do not skip the call-for-action statement because a blog left a country out.

FATF's increased-monitoring publications also say the standards call for a risk-based approach, and they warn against cutting off whole classes of customer. Read the current wording on the statement itself. This page does not reproduce it. A grey-list label is not a reason to refuse every customer with a connection to a named country. It is also not a reason to ignore a connection your program treats as higher risk.

What that June 2026 statement said about Australia

Australia was not named on the 19 June 2026 increased-monitoring statement. This page does not name the jurisdictions that were. It does not declare Australia's place on the call-for-action statement. Open that statement on the day you assess the customer. FATF membership, and enhanced follow-up after the 2015 mutual evaluation, are not the same thing as increased monitoring. FATF's country material records that the 2015 assessment left key areas open. This page does not reprint a rating table. A later plenary can change the names.

Why the reforms are the domestic point

FATF's standards have long expected coverage of designated non-financial businesses and professions, including trust and company service providers, lawyers, accountants, real estate, and dealers in precious metals and stones. Australia's 2015 mutual evaluation left important parts of that coverage open. The amended AML/CTF Act and the AML/CTF Rules 2025 are the domestic response. The new designated services commenced on 1 July 2026. For formation work, that is table 6. The gap was about who is inside the regime. This page does not claim the reform ends follow-up, and it does not predict the next statement. A commencement date is not a FATF rating.

• Open both statements. Increased monitoring, and the call for action. A grey-list headline is not both.
• Then open AUSTRAC. Your program's country risk uses AUSTRAC's high-risk countries material and the current FATF statements.
• Keep sanctions separate. A DFAT consolidated-list question is not answered by a monitoring category.
• Keep proliferation financing separate. It is a different risk, even when a country name appears in both conversations.
• Do not tip the client off. You can ask why a structure touches a higher-risk place. You do not announce that you might report them.

On a file, ask whether the customer, a beneficial owner, a person the service is for, or a person acting for the customer is connected to a place your program rates as higher risk, or to a place on the current call-for-action statement. A rumour about a grey list is a reason to open the statement, not a finding. Where the trigger for enhanced due diligence is met, you follow that procedure. Read AUSTRAC's high-risk countries page with the FATF statements. How the Act grew is when the AML/CTF Act was introduced. The coverage difference is Tranche 1 and Tranche 2. Enrolment sits on AUSTRAC Online. FreeAML does not enrol you.

Where this page stops

This page is the difference between a FATF statement and a country list you invent, and why Australia's coverage reforms matter without a forecast. The secrecy question, kept separate from the FATF call, is tax havens and money laundering. What AUSTRAC is, if you are still placing the regulator, is what AUSTRAC does.

What your client pays

FreeAML is a full AML/CTF platform for firms of every size. On FreeAML you pay $0 for the suite. There is no subscription. Your client can pay, and you can add a per-verification service charge. Verification is client-pays. On the public list a personal KYC check is $20 and a company or trust KYB check is $40. Confirm the live amounts on FreeAML pricing. FreeAML does not classify countries.

Frequently Asked Questions